Private
Category :
Research
Date:
Mar 24, 2024
Project duration :
1 Week
Project link :
Problem
Organizations need secure and flexible asset management systems that provide:
Clear hierarchical control
Granular permissions
Defined operational boundaries
Emergency controls
Recovery mechanisms
Design Approaches
Option 1: Role-Based Single Safe
Ideal for organizations that need robust role-based control within a single treasury.
Key Benefits:
Streamlined operations
Lower gas costs
Simpler maintenance
Clear role hierarchy

Option 2: Nested Safe Structure
Perfect for large organizations requiring physical separation of concerns and multiple security layers.

Key Benefits:
Physical separation of assets
Multiple security layers
Isolated risk management
Ultimate override capability
Separate recovery mechanisms per layer
Implementation Guide
When to Choose Each Option
Choose Role-Based Single Safe When:
Single treasury management is sufficient
Role-based permissions meet security needs
Quick execution is priority
Team is centralized
Choose Nested Structure When:
Physical separation of funds is required
Multiple security layers are needed
Different teams manage different operations
Ultimate override capability is essential
Multiple recovery paths are required
Role-Based Setup
Deploy Safe contract
Enable Zodiac modules for roles
Configure permission hierarchy
Set up guards and limits
Can be accomplished no-code
Nested Structure Setup
Deploy Top Safe (Master Treasury)
Deploy L2 Safe (Operations)
Configure cross-safe interactions
Set up modular controls per level
Might require some custom code
Production Considerations
Role-Based Considerations
Module upgrade strategy
Permission management
Guard configurations
Recovery procedures
Nested Structure Considerations
Cross-safe communication
Funding workflows
Emergency procedures
Multiple recovery paths
Maintainance